According to host Doug Fabrizio, if you are on a food stamp budget you have about $4 a day per person to eat. That's about $1.33 per meal. So the challenge was to put yourself on this budget and see how you did and to hopefully gain some empathy for those who are actually having to live on that kind of budget every day, all year. Taking the challenge was chef Karl Wilder. His focus on the challenge was not only to make the budgetary restraints but also to meet nutritional requirements, which he discovered was one of the more difficult parts of the challenge. You can check out his musings on the process here: (http://www.fusiononthefly.com/).
We've all heard the tales of the woman pulling up to the grocery store in a Bentley and fur coat, then going into the grocery store to buy steak and lobster with her food stamps. Many people calling into the podcast told stories of people waiting in front of grocery stores to sell their welfare cards, 50 cents on the dollar so they could, presumably, run off to buy cigarettes, booze, and blow. When asked if doing the challenge changed his outlook on welfare recipients and his opinion of those that received welfare, he said (and I'm paraphrasing here because I don't have a transcript), "absolutely. What it opened my eyes to was that all welfare is corporate welfare. Every person receiving food stamps is a worker who has been paid less so that corporations can pass on benefits to the stockholders. Every person receiving food stamps has had their hourly wages knocked back or their hours cut so they can continue to meet their profit margins."
My eyes snapped open from my semi-nap and it all started swirling in my head: All welfare is essentially corporate welfare because all government assistance allows corporations to pay less in wages, benefits, and taxes.
So today I found this:
GAO’s audit of the Fed.
The biggest bailouts follow:
Citigroup: $2.5 trillion ($2,500,000,000,000)
Morgan Stanley: $2.04 trillion ($2,040,000,000,000)
Merrill Lynch: $1.949 trillion ($1,949,000,000,000)
Bank of America: $1.344 trillion ($1,344,000,000,000)
Barclays PLC (United Kingdom): $868 billion ($868,000,000,000)
Bear Stearns: $853 billion ($853,000,000,000)
Goldman Sachs: $814 billion ($814,000,000,000)
Royal Bank of Scotland (UK): $541 billion ($541,000,000,000)
JP Morgan Chase: $391 billion ($391,000,000,000)
Deutsche Bank (Germany): $354 billion ($354,000,000,000)
UBS (Switzerland): $287 billion ($287,000,000,000)
Credit Suisse (Switzerland): $262 billion ($262,000,000,000)
Lehman Brothers: $183 billion ($183,000,000,000)
Bank of Scotland (United Kingdom): $181 billion ($181,000,000,000)
BNP Paribas (France): $175 billion ($175,000,000,000)
Morgan Stanley: $2.04 trillion ($2,040,000,000,000)
Merrill Lynch: $1.949 trillion ($1,949,000,000,000)
Bank of America: $1.344 trillion ($1,344,000,000,000)
Barclays PLC (United Kingdom): $868 billion ($868,000,000,000)
Bear Stearns: $853 billion ($853,000,000,000)
Goldman Sachs: $814 billion ($814,000,000,000)
Royal Bank of Scotland (UK): $541 billion ($541,000,000,000)
JP Morgan Chase: $391 billion ($391,000,000,000)
Deutsche Bank (Germany): $354 billion ($354,000,000,000)
UBS (Switzerland): $287 billion ($287,000,000,000)
Credit Suisse (Switzerland): $262 billion ($262,000,000,000)
Lehman Brothers: $183 billion ($183,000,000,000)
Bank of Scotland (United Kingdom): $181 billion ($181,000,000,000)
BNP Paribas (France): $175 billion ($175,000,000,000)
France? Did I read that right? The U.S. government is bailing out banks in France and the UK? Hmmm...
What if instead of that first entry being Citigroup, what if it said, "Medicare?" And instead of JP Morgan receiving $391 billion right now, what if that said "education?" JP Morgan, if you've been following the news that no one wants you to see, is in big trouble right now with the MF Global bankruptcy proceedings. They can't quite seem to find $1.3 billion (yeah, that's with a "b." Customer money that just may or may not have been used to hedge bets on bad European debt).
And what about this notion of corporate personhood? In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the John Robert's Supreme Court ruled that corporations indeed have the same rights as people. I recently watched a documentary called "The Corporation" (http://www.thecorporation.com/) that asked this simple question: If corporations are people, what kind of people are they?
Below is a test for psychopathy. I went ahead and took the test on behalf of the corporations, and according to my opinion of them (and that's just what it is, an opinion), they are psychopaths. Psychopathy is defined as this: a mental disorder in which an individual manifests amoral and antisocial behavior, lack of ability to love or establish meaningful personal relationships, extreme egocentricity, failure to learn from experience, etc.
I will close with this simple quote from Buddhist monk Thich Nhat Hanh:
"In order to rally people, governments need enemies. They want us to be afraid, To hate, So we will rally behind them. And if they do not have a real enemy, they will invent one in order to mobilize us."
It's time to go all zen on the government. It's time to love it out of its madness. It's time to stand up for your rights and not be a fly on the corporate monolith. If the corporation has been given the same rights as you, then we should, in the eyes of the government, be equal. Right?